Protecting Psychedelic Science
& Medical Development
for Public Benefit
Freedom to Operate is a non-profit seeking to advance science and education, specifically research, in the public interest and for the public benefit.
CHALLENGE INAPPROPRIATE PATENTS
IMPROVE MEDICINE & RESEARCH
Patents that attempt to appropriate pre-existing knowledge from the public commons then sell it back as a novel invention is a misuse of the patent system.
- Fighting bad patents is important public policy.
- Mistakenly issued patents can prevent research and innovation by other organizations.
- Inappropriate patent rights create excess burden or loss of economic efficiency.
We know that there can be no patent on Psilocybin as a substance,
nor on the known methods for making it or using it medically.
Freedom to Operate is a Non-Profit Corporation Organized Exclusively for
Charitable, Religious, Educational and Scientific Purposes
Challenge Improperly Claimed Patent Rights
Patent rights that are inappropriately claimed can prevent other individuals and organizations from engaging in research and innovation that would benefit the public.
Facilitate Science & Medical Research
Primarily by challenging improper patent claims, Freedom to Operate supports and facilitates scientific research for the benefit of all.
Providing Advocacy & Other Assistance
We provide advocacy around intellectual property and other business issues and we help support the conduct of medical and scientific research.
Who is Freedom to Operate?
Freedom to Operate (FTO) is a non-profit corporation organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes. FTO was formed primarily to advance science and education and specifically to support and facilitate scientific research in the public interest and public benefit.
FTO allocates its time to challenging inappropriate patent claims and conducting related medical and scientific research.
Carey Turnbull, CEO, manages these activities without compensation and with the assistance of legal, medical, and technical experts.
How We are Defending and Employing Psilocybin Research and Development
We intend to challenge patents that would have the effect of deterring, and potentially preventing, other individuals and organizations from engaging in research and innovation in the public interest.
We undertake further research in order to establish what I know to be true: there can be no patent on psilocybin as a substance, nor on the known methods for making it or using it medically.
By challenging mistakenly awarded patents and inappropriate patent rights, we enable research and development of medicines that will benefit the public.
The Case for Psilocybin Research and Development
Psilocybin can be useful in treating depression, substance abuse disorders, and other serious and painful health issues.
Psilocybin was first isolated in 1958 by a Swiss chemist, Dr. Albert Hofmann. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, more than 17 million people in the United States suffer from or have experienced major depression.
Separate studies by Charles Grob, Stephen Ross, and Roland Griffiths show promising results with participants who received psilocybin in a controlled setting with support. In fact, the research has shown a long duration of clinically significant reduction of major depression.
This is just one example as to why a substance such as psilocybin shouldn’t, and cannot, be patented.